Sociosexual attitudes differentially assume guys and you can ladies choices to possess agreeable male confronts
Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, Good., & Rumiati, R. We. (2021). The sum from character and you can intelligence to your cognitive competences within the higher education. Frontiers during the Mindset, twelve, 2566.
Damian, R. We., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, Good., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 happening 60-six: A good longitudinal study of character balance and alter across the 50 years. Log regarding Personality and Public Mindset, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, A. Meters., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of triarchic model of psychopathy and self-said Group B identification illness attributes. Character Conditions: Theory, Search, and Cures, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and you can cleverness anticipate informative school grades. Learning and private variations, 19(1), 28-33.
https://kissbrides.com/fr/femmes-chaudes-medellin/
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating informative and social–emotional consequences when you look at the emerging adulthood out-of intelligence, identification, and you can socioeconomic status. Journal off Personality and you can Public Psychology.
Holland, An effective. S., & Roisman, Grams. I. (2008). Big Five characteristics and you can relationship high quality: Self-advertised, observational, and emotional facts. Log regarding Personal and private Matchmaking, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Yards. (2006). The relationship anywhere between cleverness and split up. Diary from Household members Activities, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology off Cluster-B Character Issues throughout the Five-Grounds Model Direction. Chinese Psychological state Log.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university education and you may low-cognitive ability advancement. Oxford Economic Records, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The fresh perception off parents’ and you will spouses’ degree towards the divorce or separation pricing in Norway. Demographic research, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, E. W., Brennan, S. Meters., Haugen, P. M., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Feedback away from real appeal once the a purpose of age. The newest Journal away from Social Mindset, 125(2), 157-168.
Spouse well worth may decline (or perhaps not), although it does perhaps not be seemingly a buffer in order to matchmaking creation
McGue, M., Anderson, Age. L., Willoughby, Elizabeth., Giannelis, An effective., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not because of the grams by yourself: The advantages of a degree certainly people who have lower levels away from standard intellectual function. Intelligence, 92, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, Meters. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Try social somebody so much more stunning? A zero-friend studies out of agreeableness, extraversion, and appeal. Record out of Search within the Identity, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The brand new interaction anywhere between college impoverishment and you can agreeableness within the anticipating instructional attainment. Character and you can Private Distinctions, 127, 85-88.
Standard qualities away from identity and you will affectivity since the predictors of satisfaction within the intimate relationships: Facts from notice?and you may companion?reviews
Tatarunaite, Age., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face attractiveness: an effective longitudinal study. American Log away from Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flood, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you may Michael Westberry. Provided Public Use Microdata Series, Newest Population Survey: Variation 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., & ). Reasons for breakup and you may recollections out-of premarital input: Ramifications having improving matchmaking training. Couple and you may Family unit members Psychology: Look and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). Exactly why do personality traits expect splitting up? Several paths thanks to fulfillment. Journal out of Identity and you can Social Mindset, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. An effective., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic data of your Black Triad while the Big 5. Personality and you will individual Distinctions, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. A good., Sellbom, Yards., Chmielewski, Meters., Clark, L. A beneficial., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R., … & Wright, An effective. Grams. (2019). Identity in the a good hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 77-ninety-five.
The present day CPS investigation dont show should your threat of divorce proceedings try additive. Relationships you are going to imply blended marriage ceremonies possess large or down dangers than simply the sum total dangers of a couple some one. Yet not, past research towards divorce and you may degree demonstrates that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). New divorce or separation chance for a few PhD holders concerns fifteen%, consistent with the private threat of seven-8% getting personal PhD proprietors.
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The fresh mate changing theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143-149.
